This is a viewpoint
combining two things that have bothered me in the last year. These thoughts and topics have been stewing
in my mind. I am a Latter-day Saint
(Mormon) woman. This post is from that
view point. It is also about trust issues with our American news media outlets. I have recently expressed concerns about the
news media lacking for actual solid news, but having lots of drama and
spin. Taking facts and making
fiction. This is a huge glaring very
personal example to me.
Mr. Romney's presidential
campaign put a bright white hot light on my faith for quite some time. So,
while some people may perceive my views as more traditional and write off what
I am about to say, you couldn't be further from the truth. I'm not a traditional
Mormon. I wasn't raised Mormon, that
came later. I am not a
Republican, but that's a strained discussion for another time. Most of my family when I
was growing up were Democrats. I was
raised in a distinctly low income bracket where we relied on government
services to survive for things like food and shelter. I was the daughter of a single mother until I
was almost 12. I had an absentee drug
and alcohol addicted biological father.
I believe that without trying my mother and other important female
figures in my life were feminists for their times. The woman as a strong figure was an important
part of my upbringing. So, again, I
repeat, I am not a traditional Mormon. I
am not married and never have been. I
have never had any children and I am a career woman so to speak. Not a traditional Mormon, but a Mormon
nonetheless. Taking all of that
non-traditional-ness into consideration please read my words and digest them for
what they are worth.
I had problems with a
newspaper article that peeved me. The article that really set me off is from the New York Times, which I
often like to read online. It is about women wearing slacks or pants to church. Here is the link to the article - http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/us/19mormon.html?_r=1&
I was angry and frustrated
when I read it. I know I shouldn't let
it make me angry, but that is who I am - I am an emotional responder and I'm
being honest when I say I was angry. Let's dissect that article because I have
many a bone to pick with this one.
First, the death threats
thing was like screen worthy drama. This is one of those, "Really?
Are you kidding me? Who believes this sh, uh stuff?" moments.
I wondered if they could make Mormons seem more weird if they
tried. I've gone to so many different
Mormon congregations in different states and even in different countries that I
really can't count them all. I've seen
women dress in many types of clothes, even clothes I thought were a little to
revealing for church, but never a death threat.
Although when I could see that 17 year old girl's underwear through her
dress I did want to smack her on the back side of her head and say, "Could
you look more like hooker at church?"
I'm from the school of thought that if you are messed up in any other
part of your life the least you can do when you go to church is show some
respect. I mean you took the time to go
to church in the first place, at least pretend to be good for that hour or
more. Anyways, I think this article was total
B.S. and I don't mean the college degree.
Told you, not a traditional Mormon.
Second, when it says,
"Others said they could not participate because they were fearful of
ridicule or reprimand." Again
screen worthy drama. Where are these
people? I want to know what
congregations they attend so that I can tell someone to straighten this
out. This is not normal
"Mormon" behavior to ridicule or reprimand unless you are 17 and the dress is
totally like a hooker dress. Again, could
they make Mormons seem more weird?
Third, the comment,
"Organizers hope the dialogue will now expand to include issues like the
ordination of women, or women taking on more responsibilities at church
events." Holy Priesthood Batman! These women don't need ordination to be
whole. How have they missed this? For fear of my message getting lost in this
one piece of doctrinal deep water, let me express this as simply as possible. The Latter-Day Saint woman is whole and
glorious in the sight of God without being ordained. If I am whole in the sight of God without it,
why would I want it? For personal,
selfish, or self-aggrandizing desires. Not for good or God.
I must express my strong
feelings on the part of the quote about women taking on more responsibilities
at church events. Are you kidding me? Does the person who wrote this do ANY
research before spouting this nonsense?
What congregation are these women attending, because a congregation
where men take on more of the responsibilities at church events is perfectly
fine with me, but I doubt that it exists.
In the congregations I have attended all over the U.S. and Europe women do a minimum of a third to half of the
responsibilities at church events.
Depending on the event sometimes women perform 100% of the
responsibilities.
Fourth, the statement,
"They also cited the pronounced role of the Boy Scouts in the church —
boys routinely become troop leaders in the organization, but girls have no
similar outlet with the Girl Scouts."
Duh, if you want to put your daughters in Girl Scouts, do it. No one is stopping you. In addition, there are activities and
programs geared specifically for young women called the Personal Progress
program. It is based on LDS doctrinal
beliefs and is structured with developing leadership, goal setting and achievement for the young women only. There is also the young women camping
activity every summer. Obtaining the
Young Womanhood Recognition is the equivalent of the Boy Scout Eagle Scout
award within the church. I received mine
at 17 and I knew I was special for this unique achievement. So, again my response is, "Did this guy
do any research at all?"
Fifth and this is my most
anger-worthy sentence from the whole dang article, "the fact that young
men are expected to go on two-year missions to spread the faith, but young
women are not. The result: the vast majority of Mormon missionaries are
men." I served an honorable mission
for my church. I knew at the ripe old age
of 16 this is what I wanted for myself.
At no point in time in the 5 years between 16 and 21 did anyone ever discourage
me from wanting to serve or from going.
If anything it was the reverse. I
was encouraged. Yes, young men are ‘strongly’
encouraged to go, but not one person is stopping the young women. After last year's announcement lowering the age for women to go from 21 to 19 more and more young
women have started submitting papers and begun serving missions turning that
male female ratio to almost 50/50. Get
outta here with this junk.
Lest you think I am condemning the New York Times,
fear not I’m not a conservative picking on a liberal newspaper. That would
require me to be conservative, which I am not.
I’m a moderate looking left and looking right and seeing nothing but
polarization and fairy-tales. You cannot
trust the American news media to give you the cold hard facts. They expect others to look
through glasses with a prescription so wrong that you can never see clear reality or find intelligent objectivity.
To heck with that. Not this Mormon woman.